Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 29, 2007Keywords:
Article Details
Open access articles published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology are under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology is retained by the author(s). The authors grant the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology with a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
Use of the article in whole or in part in any medium requires proper citation as follows:
Title of Article, Names of the Author, Year of Publication, Journal Title, Volume (Issue) and page. Links to the final article on the JSRE website are encouraged.
The Creative Commons Attribution License does not affect any other rights held by authors or third parties in the article, including without limitation the rights of privacy and publicity. Use of the article must not assert or imply, whether implicitly or explicitly, any connection with, endorsement or sponsorship of such use by the author, publisher or any other party associated with the article.
For any reuse or distribution, users must include the copyright notice and make clear to others that the article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution license, linking to the relevant Creative Commons web page. Users may impose no restrictions on the use of the article other than those imposed by the Creative Commons Attribution license.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the article is made available as is and without representation or warranties of any kind whether express, implied, statutory or otherwise and including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, absence of defects, accuracy, or the presence or absence of errors.
Main Article Content
Field grain losses and insect pest management practices in subsistence agriculture: Farmers' perceptions
Abstract
A farm survey was conducted in subsistence farming communities to document the major grain crops, insect pests, indigenous pest control methods (PCM) and farmer perceptions of grain losses associated with identifiable pest species and perceived efficacies of the PCMs. Maize, beans and sorghum were identified as the major staple food crops, with the major pests being cutworm, stem borers, aphids, beanfly, pod borers, armyworms and termites. Statistical analyses revealed that the level of crop yield losses was dependent upon the area cropped, total yield and respondents' background. There was, however, a negative correlation between crop yield loss due to insect pests and the efficacy of PCM applied. Farmers lost, on average, 24.75% of their crop to insect pests with high value crops suffering the greatest insect pest attack in terms of species diversity and magnitude of damage incurred. The occurrence of field insect pests varied from season to season with most species reportedly occurring during the long rains. Most (72.6%) farmers never applied any PCM against all the insect pests of food crops. The use of synthetic pesticides and alternatives accounted for less than 10%. Seventy one percent of the respondents crops, with the major pests being cutworm, stem borers, aphids, beanfly, pod borers, armyworms and termites. Statistical analyses revealed that the level of crop yield losses was dependent upon the area cropped, total yield and respondents' background. There was, however, a negative correlation between crop yield loss due to insect pests and the efficacy of PCM applied. Farmers lost, on average, 24.75% of their crop to insect pests with high value crops suffering the greatest insect pest attack in terms of species diversity and magnitude of damage incurred. The occurrence of field insect pests varied from season to season with most species reportedly occurring during the long rains. Most (72.6%) farmers never applied any PCM against all the insect pests of food crops. The use of synthetic pesticides and alternatives accounted for less than 10%. Seventy one percent of the respondents reported that the efficacy of the PCMs applied was unknown. Some of the indigenous PCMs reportedly used included crude powders and aqueous extracts of local botanical plants such as Tobacco, Tephrosia, and Basil. The study recommends that bioassay-guided investigations be instituted to develop and rationalise the use of identified PCM strategies compatible with the target user domains.
Keywords: Farmer perceptions yield loss, indigenous pest control
Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology Vol. 8 (1) 2006: pp. 24-42
