Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 2, 2022Keywords:
Article Details
Open access articles published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology are under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY license permits commercial and non-commercial re-use of an open-access article, as long as the author is properly attributed.
Copyright on any research article published in the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology is retained by the author(s). The authors grant the Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology with a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
Use of the article in whole or in part in any medium requires proper citation as follows:
Title of Article, Names of the Author, Year of Publication, Journal Title, Volume (Issue) and page. Links to the final article on the JSRE website are encouraged.
The Creative Commons Attribution License does not affect any other rights held by authors or third parties in the article, including without limitation the rights of privacy and publicity. Use of the article must not assert or imply, whether implicitly or explicitly, any connection with, endorsement or sponsorship of such use by the author, publisher or any other party associated with the article.
For any reuse or distribution, users must include the copyright notice and make clear to others that the article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution license, linking to the relevant Creative Commons web page. Users may impose no restrictions on the use of the article other than those imposed by the Creative Commons Attribution license.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the article is made available as is and without representation or warranties of any kind whether express, implied, statutory or otherwise and including, without limitation, warranties of title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, absence of defects, accuracy, or the presence or absence of errors.
Main Article Content
Composite electricity distribution poles for Kenya: a predictive, systematic and meta- analytic review
Abstract
Increasing levels of global forest denudation have led to increased global warming due to rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. This is further exacerbated by the need for poles for power distribution among other uses. A need, therefore, exists to venture into alternative poles that are environmentally friendly and address the effects of deforestation. The paper addresses this emerging issue by suggesting the adoption of composite poles for power distribution in Kenya. Composite poles are those whose outer materials are ultraviolet stabilized, recyclable, and resistant to corrosion and attacks such as from insects and rodents. The outer material also has minimum water porosity. The inner material, on the other hand, is made of both fiber and Polyurethane material. The fibres are organic and can be of industrial or biological materials such as fiberglass, carbon fibre, or plant fibre, among others. This paper analyses the composition, available technologies, socio-economic benefits as well as risks to be mitigated by the adoption of composite poles in Kenya. Analysis of the total cost per pole installed for various pole types was done. Data collection methods involved interviewing Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC) staff, the observation made at the Limuru factory, and the use of existing documentation by KPLC and the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS). The paper reviewed studies done by KPLC and standards developed thereof by KEBS. Further key attributes of various pole technologies were compared and a comparison of composite poles with wood and concrete poles was carried out. In addition, the technical features of poles were compared. Data collected was analysed and the results were presented in tabular forms. The cost analyses of the various poles and a summary of the failure of wooden poles in various regions throughout Kenya were also covered. The study has demonstrated based on a life-term analysis, that composite poles would save up to 40% of the total costs incurred for projects that are replacing wooden and concrete poles over 80 years. This translates to about KES 51, 868, 363 per composite lifetime or about KES 648, 354 per year (USD 5,533.60 /a) in addition to the added benefits of easier and quicker installations, low operation costs, and longevity. Further still, Composites poles would significantly impact the amount of money charged to connect new clients to the Grid electricity. The study concludes by indicating that a need exists for further analysis of the cost elements using Net Present Value (NPV) approaches.
