Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 14, 2008Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Read more here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Main Article Content
On social justice: Comparing Paul with Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics
Abstract
In “In search of Paul” (2004) Crossan and Reed argue that Paul's vision and program were essentially in continuity with Jesus': both opposed, be it in Galilean villages or Roman cities, an unjust imperial system by means of an alternative project of egalitarian,
distributive justice. Although Crossan elsewhere demonstrates the deep roots of this concern in the Jewish tradition, he tends to downplay the importance of Greek contributions in this regard. The purpose of this essay will be to offer, in constant dialogue with
Crossan (and Reed), a more refined comparison of social justice in Paul on the one hand and Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics on the other. If Paul tried to establish egalitarian and sharing Christian communities under the Roman empire, how do this vision and
program compare and contrast with Plato\'s hierarchical but communal concept of justice, Aristotle's distributive notion according to merit, and most importantly the Stoics' argument of “oikeiosis” (i.e., other-concern by concentrical familiarization with
the other)?
HTS Theological Studies Vol. 63 (1) 2007: pp. 19-48
