Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 26, 2021Keywords:
Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publishing rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Read more here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Main Article Content
The continued debate on law and gospel among selected Lutheran scholars within the change agency paradigm
Ramathate T. Dolamo
Abstract
It is interesting that since 1517 when Luther placed the 95 theses on the Wittenberg chapel door, debates ensued with vitality and freshness. Many aspects of the Reformation movement were debated by scholars of all persuasions, including even Roman Catholic theologians. The debates have become contextualised according to regions and countries and the end of the 20th century and the turn of the 21st have seen the deepening of the debates as scholars wrestle with the issues. This article will confine itself to the debate on the law and gospel among some selected Lutheran scholars with the view to finding some common ground on the topic without stunting further debate and research on the topic. In fact, this article should be able to provoke more thought-provoking discussions on the topic with questions like: What is the relationship between law and gospel if God’s Word is both law and gospel? Should we speak of law and gospel or gospel and law? Should we distinguish between law and gospel? What is the use of the gospel and what are the uses of the law? If God’s Word is both law and gospel, how should we strike the balance between the two to avoid overemphasising one at the expense of the other within the change agency paradigm?
