Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 15, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise.
Licensing and publication rights
Author(s) of work published by AOSIS are required to grant AOSIS the unlimited rights to publish the definitive work in any format, language and medium, for any lawful purpose. AOSIS requires journal authors to publish their work in open access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence.
The authors retain the non-exclusive right to do anything they wish with the published article(s), provided attribution is given to the applicable journal with details of the original publication, as set out in the official citation of the article published in the journal. The retained right specifically includes the right to post the article on the authors’ or their institution’s websites or in institutional repositories.
Previously published work may have been published under a different licence. We advise the community that if they would like to reuse the work to consult the applicable licence at article level.
Note: If you need to comply with your funding body policy, you can apply for the CC BY license after your manuscript is accepted for publication.
Main Article Content
Pulmonary embolism diagnosis with D-dimer levels and computed tomography
Rochelle A. Kruger
Jeanetta du Plessis
Henra Muller
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE), a common heart and blood vessel disease, causes complications such as haemodynamic instability and cardiovascular mortality. Timely diagnosis and treatment are imperative for managing this potentially life-threatening
condition.
Aim: The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between an elevated D-dimer level and a positive computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), which could confirm PE in patients with chest pain and suspected PE.
Setting: Data were collected at a private diagnostic radiology practice located in Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from the Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS).
Results: Of the sampled patients (n = 1219), only 16.7% were diagnosed with PE after CTPA. Approximately 14% of the D-dimer-positive patient group were diagnosed with PE and, in the D-dimer-negative patient group, approximately 20% of the patients were diagnosed
with PE. Of the patients sampled, 86% were not diagnosed with PE despite having increased D-dimer values. No specific trends in the relation between elevated D-dimer levels and a positive PE diagnosis could be identified at the significance level of 0.05; a Chi-square test of independence indicated (χ2 [1, N = 995] = 1.84, p = 0.175).
Conclusion: No strong relationship between elevated D-dimer levels in the blood and a positive yield of PE after CTPA; was found hence, clinical decision rules for PE workups need refining, especially to limit unnecessary CTPA referrals in this setting.
Contribution: The findings suggest that PE workup at the private practice should be revised to improve the quality of service.
