A toolkit to support postgraduate research supervisors in supervisory processes: an integrative literature review

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this integrative literature review was first to review current studies on the supervision process and the roles and responsibilities of the supervisor. The second aim was to use the findings to describe a ‘supervisory toolkit’ to enhance effective postgraduate research supervision.

Background. Although research supervision forms an integral part of academic work, academic staff is often not formally equipped to provide quality supervision. Academic outputs are dependent on quality supervision.

Design. Integrative review Data Sources. CINAHL search using the databases Academic Search Premier, Africa-Wide Information, Business Source Premier, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), E-Journals, ERIC, Family & Society Studies Worldwide, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Humanities Source, MasterFILE Premier, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, Social Work Abstracts and TOC Premier. Keywords were searched. Thirty studies published between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed.

Review Methods. Studies were appraised using recognized evaluation tools. Thematic analysis was undertaken and emergent themes were extracted

Results. The supervision process is depicted as an interconnected learning and developmental process that takes place within a relationship. The three main roles of the supervisor with their associated responsibilities reflect the research supervisor as a project manager, quality assurer and counsellor.

Conclusion. The toolkit is based on a thematic analysis of an integrative literature review, and can be utilised by supervisors to direct the activities required for effective postgraduate supervisory practice.

Keywords: research supervision process, responsibilities of the research supervisor, roles of the research supervisor, toolkit research supervision