Conquest and Law as a Eurocentric enterprise: An Azanian philosophical critique of legal epistemic violence in “South Africa”

Abstract

This essay will critically analyse how conquest that resulted in white settler colonialism laid the foundation for epistemic violence.  Epistemic violence, which took the form of the imposition of the law of the European conqueror in the wake of land dispossession in 1652  in South Africa is the fundamental problem this essay will critically engage with. We will rely on the Azanian philosophical tradition as a  theoretical framework to critique this legal epistemic violence. Our theoretical framework is in line with Afrikan jurisprudence, which is  grounded in the culture and worldview of the Indigenous people conquered in wars of conquest. Fundamental to our argument is that  the law of the European conqueror, which was imposed through conquest is a Eurocentric enterprise, which seeks to negate the Afrikan  worldview and culture and reinforce historic injustice. It is important to note that epistemic violence commenced with the issuing of papal bulls, which undergirded conquest and white settler colonialism in South Africa. The thesis of the essay is that in the wake of conquest  and the attendant imposition of the law of the European conqueror, white settlers used their law to technicalise issues of historic injustice  such as land dispossession. It is in this sense that this essay seeks to contribute to the decolonisation of law by foregrounding  the worldview and culture of the Indigenous conquered people.