A Comparative Analysis of the Phenomenology of Time in the Works of John McTaggart and John Mbiti

Abstract

The issue of time remains a topic of ongoing discussion in both theological and philosophical literature. Currently, within the field of  theology, there is a significant focus on the concept of time, which is the subject of disputes regarding the nature of God's eternity. These  discussions involve inquiries into whether God exists outside of time or within it. Philosophical discussions often centre around the  ontology and metaphysics of time, exploring whether time is characterised by a static or dynamic nature. This paper did not delve  into the controversies surrounding God's eternity. However, it focused on the phenomenology of time as discussed by two contrasting theorists, namely John McTaggart (1866-1925) and John Mbiti (1931-2019). McTaggart, an English philosopher, contends that time is  unreal. According to the African scholar Mbiti, time is indeed real, but it moves in a reverse direction instead of the forward direction  generally perceived in Western tradition. Consequently, Mbiti refutes the existence of the future. As far as is known, there are no existing  comparison studies on these two experts. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to address this vacuum. The paper utilised  comparative lenses to assess the metaphysical claims of these two thinkers about the phenomenology of time, intending to gain a  deeper comprehension of time from their respective viewpoints. The process was executed in three sequential stages. It first analysed  McTaggart's explanation of time, and then proceeded to investigate Mbiti's notion of time. Finally, a comparative examination was conducted before concluding. The conclusion is that McTaggart and Mbiti neglect to consider the potential existence of objective time,  which would be independent of events, change, and motion. This paper adds to the field of philosophical theology, specifically focusing  on modern debates on God and time.