Main Article Content
Evaluation of EM-2 as Biological Crop Residue Treatment Option Targeted for Feeding Crossbred Dairy Cattle
Abstract
A study was conducted at Holetta Agricultural Research Center with the objective to evaluate the effect of ensiling crop residues (wheat, barley and oat) with extended EM solution (EM2) on the nutritive value, in-vivo digestibility coefficients and animal response. Accordingly, crude protein (CP), DOMD (digestible organic matter in the dry matter), EME (estimated metabolizable energy), total ash, NDF (Neutral detergent fiber), ADF (Acid detergent fibre) and lignin (P<0.05) were significantly (P<0.05) improved by EM2 treatment as compared to the untreated straws. On the contrary, DM (dry matter) & OM (Organic matter) losses as a result of EM-2 treatment were substantial (P<0.05) for all the three residues under investigation. Barely straw was found to be higher (P<0.05) for all chemical compositions and in-vitro digestibility values except DM & OM. The rate of change calculated as percentage differences over the original untreated residue was higher for the relatively inferior quality wheat straw. From the result of the first laboratory trial, application of EM2 at the rate of 1 liter per kg straw mass have been seen to adequately improve chemical compositions and in-vitro digestibility of cereal residues. In the second trial were mid lactating Boran-Fresian crossbreds cows have been fed with either ad libtum EM2 treated or untreated barley straw and supplemented with different levels of on-station formulated dairy concentrate @ 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 kg/liter of milk daily intake of EM2 treated barley straw was significantly improved (P<0.05) for all experimental cows other than those on the control diet. Daily total DM intake followed same trend as for the basal feed intake. Among experimental cows receiving treated straw basal diet cows on dietary T3 consumed superiorly higher (P<0.05) daily total feed intake. In general, daily intakes for all nutrients under considerations were higher (P<0.05) for cows fed the EM2 treated barley straw as a basal diet on a daily basis. While maximum daily nutrient intake (P<0.05) was recorded for cows receiving T3 lower intakes (P<0.05) were recorded for cows that have received the control diet. There was no difference (P>0.05) for apparent digestibility of DM & OM. Higher digestibility coefficients of CP, NDF and ADF were recorded for cows maintained under dietary T3. Daily milk yield and compositions except milk lactose and total solids were statistically different (P<0.05) among cows that were fed with the treated barley straw diet and when same cows were compared with those that have been fed with the untreated barley straw basal diet. Higher milk (P<0.05) was, however, produced by the cows receiving dietary T3. However, due to high cost of straw treatment compared to cows on the control diet the gross and net profit obtained from intervention treatments were marginal.