Main Article Content

Coherence in Ecclesiastes 3:16–22


Kimmo Huovila
Dan Lioy

Abstract

Ecclesiastes 3:16–22 has been interpreted as an incoherent text or as having unresolved tension. This article seeks to explain the flow of  thought in the text. Various exegetical options are evaluated in light of the text and the theology of the book. To trace the flow of  thought, different views on the coherence of the text are surveyed and evaluated on the basis of the exegesis. This article argues that the  text can be understood as a coherent whole discussing two reactions to observing a corrupt court. One is an affirmation of an afterlife  judgment and the other is an expression of human limitations. The concept of human limitations is offered as an argument to renounce  futile pursuit of permanent profit in this life and to pursue joy as a gift given by God.


Journal Identifiers


eISSN: 1996-8167