Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 21, 2023Keywords:
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All issues of Conspectus are open access, implying that they are available for download at no cost from https://sats.ac.za/conspectus/. Subscription fees and embargo periods do not apply, and readers and authors are allowed to freely share the links and content. Readers can read, print, share, link, or use articles without the permission of the Editorial Team or authors.
Once an article is published in the journal, copyright is transferred to SATS. Conspectus is protected by Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), as stipulated here.
After publication, authors are entitled to:
- share their work on any chosen platform (including conferences and educational purposes),
- expand and edit the article for a thesis or dissertation, and
- republish the article elsewhere, provided the new publisher is made aware of the former publication. In addition, the republished article must include a citation of the original article in Conspectus.
Main Article Content
Denial versus betrayal: A Case study analysis of Simon Peter and Judas Iscariot in the Fourth Gospel
Abstract
This journal article undertakes a case study analysis of Simon Peter and Judas Iscariot in the Fourth Gospel. A review of the extant academic literature indicates this is a relevant lacuna, one meriting further consideration. Methodologically, the article situates the endeavor within the context of the Synoptic Gospels. This is followed by a descriptive analysis of the Fourth Gospel’s portrait of Peter and Judas, respectively. The wrap-up to the essay undertakes a theological and pastoral assessment of Peter’s denial versus Judas’s betrayal of Jesus. The major claim is that Peter experienced a restoration and reinstatement as the Savior’s disciple, whereas Judas endured despair, remorse, and suicide. While the underlying premise might appear to be self-evident, the reason for these two radically different outcomes is far from obvious. Seminal to this study is a consideration of 2 Corinthians 7:10–11, which provides theological insight concerning the divergent ends experienced by two of Jesus’s most iconic disciples.
