Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 30, 2024Keywords:
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All materials published in the Babcock University Medical Journal (BUMJ) are protected by the Copyrights Laws of Nigeria. The Authors reserves copyright of their published articles but gives all the users (Authors, Readers, and Researchers) free access to all materials published online under the provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License. However, permissions are granted to copy, use, and distribute the contents only for non-commercial but academic and scientific purposes with the proviso that the source of the content is appropriately cited and credited.
Main Article Content
The effect of text-messaging on the utilisation of health facilities among pregnant women during delivery in Cross River State, Nigeria
Agbede CO
Abstract
Objective: Uptake of skilled care during delivery is associated with positive maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Studies reveal Nigeria accounts for a significant percentage of global maternal deaths, which have been associated with poor skilled attendants at delivery. Text messaging has proven to be effective in promoting health facilities’ utilisation in Nigeria. Therefore, this research assessed the influence of text messaging intervention on the utilisation of health facilities during delivery in Cross River State
Methods: Quasi-experimental research design was employed. A sample size of thirty per LGA in two LGAs was used. Participants were purposively selected and grouped into text messaging and Control Groups ). The experimental group received text briefs three times per week for four weeks, while the control group received regular ANC sessions. A structured and validated questionnaire with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics at a 5% level of significance.
Results: At baseline, the proportion of women who utilised HFs during delivery was 13.3% (experimental group) and 33.3% (control group). Furthermore, at the 8th-week follow-up, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in T-M (76.7%), compared with CG (33.3%) with an increase of 63.4% for the T-M compared to CG (3.3%, p > 0.05).
Conclusion: T-M intervention improved the utilisation of HFs during delivery among PW. The study recommends that health workers should incorporate mobile T-M intervention strategy which has proven to be a useful tool during ANC.
