Main Article Content
Predictors of physicians’ practices related to nutritional counseling and management in Riyadh City
Abstract
Arabia.
Objectives: The objectives of the study were to investigate physicians’ practices concerning NC&M and to explore some determinants that predict such practices.
Results: Data of 266 physicians working in big hospitals in Riyadh showed that only 7.9% of the respondents reported that they were practicing all aspects of NC&M; including nutritional assessment, therapy, and education. Those who practiced any one of these aspects ranged between 13.9– 40.2%, meanwhile, 28% frankly reported that they did not practice NC&M. In the last year, the mean percentage of patients placed on nutrition therapy was 24.15 ± 27.78% and the mean percentage of clinic time dedicated to NC&M was 21.49 ±20.54%. Most of the respondents
(72.9%) had poor nutritional knowledge score. Overall, 19.2% previously attended CME in nutrition. Only 1.5% and 28.6% self-assessed themselves as ‘‘outstanding’’ and ‘‘good’’ in NC&M skills and the mean total self-efficacy in NC&M was moderate. The majority (77.8%) perceived NC&M
as highly or moderately relevant to their specialties. Physicians attitude and perceived efficacy towards NC&M was moderately high as the mean scores were greater than their midpoint. Their perceived barriers of NC&M were considerably moderate; as the mean total score was found to be near the midpoint of that scale. Among the seven independent variables entered the binary logistic regression of physicians practice of NC&M, only the knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy scores were significantly associated with their NC&M practice. These three predictors contributed by
23.5% of the variation of physician practice of NC&M.
Conclusions: Physicians knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes and other factors should be stressed in any intervention warranted to improve their nutritional practices.