Urethral advancement procedure in the treatment of primary distal hypospadias: a series of 20 cases

Abstract

Introduction: Distal hypospadias is the most common genital anomaly, occurring in almost 65% of all hypospadias cases. Although there are several surgical techniques for the treatment of distal hypospadias, it is clear that none can be used to correct all forms of hypospadias. The aim of the study was to evaluate urethral advancement in the repair of primary distal penile hypospadias with regard to feasibility, complication rates and the final cosmetic outcome.

Patients and methods: Between October 2014 and June 2015, the urethral mobilization technique was used in 20 patients who presented at the Pediatric Surgery Unit, Tanta University Hospital, with primary distal hypospadias. A submeatal crescent-like incision was performed a few millimeters proximal to the meatus with two vertical incisions from the lateral ends of the submeatal incisions. The urethra within the corpus spongiosum was dissected from the skin of the ventral surface and from the glans and corpora cavernosa for a distance of ~ 4 : 1. The urethra was advanced till the urethral meatus reached its normal position without any tension. Spongioplsty can be performed, and covering Buck’s or Dartos’ layers can be used. The follow-up was conducted on a weekly basis in the outpatient clinic in the first month, and then every month for 6 months.

Results: The age of the patient at the time of operation ranged from 6 to 24 months, with a mean age of 10.5 months. The operative time ranged from 60 to 90 min, with a mean time of 73.5 min. Intraoperative urethral injury occurred only in one patient. In all patients, the catheter was removed immediately postoperatively except for one patient who had operative urethral injury. Deep wound infection was noticed in only one patient, followed by partial glanular disruption. Only one patient had urethrocutaneous fistula and two patients had meatal retraction.

Conclusion: Urethral advancement can be used safely in the mobilization of the distal urethra with wide glanular dissection and wide lateral mobilization of glanular wings. However, it should be stressed that in the presence of hypoplastic distal urethra and/or persistent ventral curvature, another technique should be adopted. The majority of our patients had very good cosmetic results and minimal complication. However, the technique requires further studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up periods to draw more precise and final conclusions.

Keywords: distal hypospidaus, primary, urethral advancement