Published material in the AJFAND is covered by copyright. Authors transfer all rights to the journal upon publication. The Editor-in-Chief should grant permission for use/reprint of any published material in AJFAND.
AJFAND is open access and published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International license (see Copyright Statement on the AJFAND website).
Author Biographies
D.T. Chagwena
Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe; School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
G.T. Matanhire
Nutri@ctive Zimbabwe, 96 Golden Stairs Rd, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe; Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe
T.Z. Jombo
Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe
C.C. Maponga
School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Main Article Content
Protein quality of commonly consumed edible insects in Zimbabwe
D.T. Chagwena
G.T. Matanhire
T.Z. Jombo
C.C. Maponga
Abstract
Consumption of edible insects as alternative animal protein-source is a potential longterm solution to curb protein deficiency in resource-limited communities where diets lacking in protein are predominant. Entomophagy has been expressed in both developed and developing countries, and previous studies have proven that edible insects are high in protein. However, there is paucity of information on protein quality of edible insects to adequately guide populations on their utilization as good alternative protein sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in most regions of Zimbabwe, namely Imbrasia belina (mopane worms), Locusta migratoria (locust) and Encosternum delegorguei (stinkbug). Kjeldahl method was used to evaluate crude protein of edible insects and a 20-day mice-feeding trial was conducted to evaluate protein efficiency ratio and protein digestibility in comparison to a control protein (casein). Crude protein was higher in Locusta migratoria (71.2%) compared to Imbrasia belina (57.7%) and Encosternum delegorguei (31.3%). Protein efficiency ratio was lower in insect samples L. migratoria (2.3), I Belina (1.96), E. delegorguei (2.0) compared to control casein (2.5). There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in protein efficiency ratio between the three edible insects and casein. Protein digestibility of the three insects (I. belina-92%, L. migratoria-90%, E. delegorguei-92%) was high and comparable to that of casein (96%). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in protein digestibility between the three insect protein sources and casein. The results showed high protein quality of three edible insects commonly consumed in Zimbabwe comparable to casein, a high quality animal protein. High protein digestibility of edible insects indicated ease in absorption and improved utilisation in the body. The lower PER values for I. Belina and E. delegorguei could possibly indicate that these edible insects may be limiting in the amino acids that support body tissue building and growth. Edible insects are a good source of quality protein that could meet protein requirements in resource-limited populations to curb protein deficiency. There is a strong need to further promote edible insects as a good alternative animal protein source.
Keywords: Protein Efficiency Ratio, Digestibility, Protein quality, Edible Insects
Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2019; 19(3): 14674-14689
Donate
AJOL is a Non Profit Organisation that cannot function without donations.
AJOL and the millions of African and international researchers who rely on our free services are deeply grateful for your contribution.
AJOL is annually audited and was also independently assessed in 2019 by E&Y.
Your donation is guaranteed to directly contribute to Africans sharing their research output with a global readership.
Once off donations here:
For annual AJOL Supporter contributions, please view our Supporters page.
Tell us what you think and showcase the impact of your research!
Please take 5 minutes to contribute to our survey so that we can better understand the contribution that African research makes to global and African development challenges. Share your feedback to help us make sure that AJOL's services support and amplify the voices of researchers like you.