Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
A. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES OPEN ACCESS POLICY
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Interpretation of tuberculin skin-test results in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children
Abstract
Introduction: The tuberculin skin test is one of the most valuable tests for demonstrating tuberculous infection in both symptomatic and asymptomatic children. However, its application is often undermined by difficulties in interpretation of results arising from its low sensitivity and specificity.
Objectives: This review aimed to use the concept of induration distribution analysis to estimate the induration size demarcating positive from negative results in a group of children with suspected tuberculosis, and to compare this cut-off with available guidelines for interpretation of the Mantoux test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children.
Methods: The results of Mantoux tests of children presenting with suspected tuberculosis over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed and plotted on a frequency distribution curve. The distribution was used to define a demarcation between positive and negative reactions. The resultant cut-off was compared with currently published guidelines for interpretation of the Mantoux test.
Results: Two hundred (200) Mantoux results were analysed out of 202 records reviewed. Induration sizes ranged from 0 to 60 mm, with a mean of 9.4 mm. The induration distribution showed a bimodal pattern, with 103 patients showing no reaction (0 mm), and 96 (48%) patients with an induration size of ³ 5 mm, with the second mode at 15-19 mm. The demarcating antimode was at 5 mm.
Conclusions: The induration distribution showed that a cut-off induration size of 5 mm was appropriate for this group of patients. This was in agreement with currently published guidelines for the interpretation of the Mantoux test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children.
Key words: Mantoux, induration distribution, tuberculosis, children
African Health Sciences Vol.5(2) 2005: 152-156
Objectives: This review aimed to use the concept of induration distribution analysis to estimate the induration size demarcating positive from negative results in a group of children with suspected tuberculosis, and to compare this cut-off with available guidelines for interpretation of the Mantoux test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children.
Methods: The results of Mantoux tests of children presenting with suspected tuberculosis over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed and plotted on a frequency distribution curve. The distribution was used to define a demarcation between positive and negative reactions. The resultant cut-off was compared with currently published guidelines for interpretation of the Mantoux test.
Results: Two hundred (200) Mantoux results were analysed out of 202 records reviewed. Induration sizes ranged from 0 to 60 mm, with a mean of 9.4 mm. The induration distribution showed a bimodal pattern, with 103 patients showing no reaction (0 mm), and 96 (48%) patients with an induration size of ³ 5 mm, with the second mode at 15-19 mm. The demarcating antimode was at 5 mm.
Conclusions: The induration distribution showed that a cut-off induration size of 5 mm was appropriate for this group of patients. This was in agreement with currently published guidelines for the interpretation of the Mantoux test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children.
Key words: Mantoux, induration distribution, tuberculosis, children
African Health Sciences Vol.5(2) 2005: 152-156
