Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
A. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES OPEN ACCESS POLICY
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Sexually transmitted diseases in Zimbabwe: a qualitative analysis of factors associated with choice of a health care facility
Abstract
Background: The control of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) through rapid and effective treatment is critical in reducing the transmission of HIV infection. This is only possible when STD patients access appropriate STD care services.
Objectives: To examine factors associated with choice of STD health care facility in Zimbabwe.
Methods: Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to collect data from the following settings: Antenatal clinics, well baby clinics, long distance bus stops/market places, bars, areas (compounds) behind bars, factory sites and youth clubs. Data from 26 FGDs attended by 281 antenatal clinic attendees, 34 FGDs of 350 women attending well baby clinics, 8 FGDs of 82 women recruited at long distance bus stops/market places, 9 FGDs of 115 sex workers, 11 FGDs of 124 male factory workers, and 5 FGDs of 44 female adolescents belonging to youth clubs were analysed.
Results: In total 93 FGDs were held of which 76 (81.7%) took place in urban areas and 17 in rural areas. Asked which health facility they would attend if they had an STD, all the different groups of the population mentioned a local clinic except for sex workers who preferred a hospital or a traditional practitioner, and male factory workers who preferred a factory clinic. Among the factors that would be considered in choosing a health facility were accessibility and affordability (stated by all groups), and privacy/ confidentiality, health care providers' attitudes, caring or professionalism (stated by all groups except male factory workers).
Conclusion: Although accessibility and affordability were the common factors mentioned by all the groups, it is important to consider group specific factors in the choice of health care facilities.
African Health Sciences Vol.5(2) 2005: 114-118
Objectives: To examine factors associated with choice of STD health care facility in Zimbabwe.
Methods: Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used to collect data from the following settings: Antenatal clinics, well baby clinics, long distance bus stops/market places, bars, areas (compounds) behind bars, factory sites and youth clubs. Data from 26 FGDs attended by 281 antenatal clinic attendees, 34 FGDs of 350 women attending well baby clinics, 8 FGDs of 82 women recruited at long distance bus stops/market places, 9 FGDs of 115 sex workers, 11 FGDs of 124 male factory workers, and 5 FGDs of 44 female adolescents belonging to youth clubs were analysed.
Results: In total 93 FGDs were held of which 76 (81.7%) took place in urban areas and 17 in rural areas. Asked which health facility they would attend if they had an STD, all the different groups of the population mentioned a local clinic except for sex workers who preferred a hospital or a traditional practitioner, and male factory workers who preferred a factory clinic. Among the factors that would be considered in choosing a health facility were accessibility and affordability (stated by all groups), and privacy/ confidentiality, health care providers' attitudes, caring or professionalism (stated by all groups except male factory workers).
Conclusion: Although accessibility and affordability were the common factors mentioned by all the groups, it is important to consider group specific factors in the choice of health care facilities.
African Health Sciences Vol.5(2) 2005: 114-118
