Article Sidebar
Article Details
Issue
Section
Articles
A. AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES OPEN ACCESS POLICY
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Adequacy and efficiency of nursing staff in a child-welfare-clinic at Umtata General Hospital, South Africa
Abstract
Background: South Africa has a serious shortage of human and financial resources to provide primary healthcare services especially in the historically under-served areas. It is a tedious task to carry out healthcare delivery for the masses without rationalizing human resources in the form of re-allocation and re-deployment of healthcare personnel. This study aimed to establish the level of adequacy and efficiency of nursing staff in the former Transkei region. The study was carried out in the child and family welfare clinic of the Umtata General Hospital.
Objective: To assess adequacy and efficiency of nursing staff in a child welfare clinic.
Method: This was a retrospective study. The workload of two nurses allocated to the child welfare clinic at Umtata General Hospital South Africa was calculated based on the patient numbers and hours of work per week. Calculations excluded time breaks for tea, lunch and annual leave. This work load was compared to the norms of standard examination time that is 12 minutes per patient obtained from the sub directorate of Natalia Office of the Department of Health. Information regarding number of patients attended to by the nurses and their disease conditions was obtained from retrospective review of hospital records.
Results: While each nurse was on duty for 8 hours per day each had only 6 reproductive hours. The two nurses examined only 310 patients giving staff utilization of 2.46% (i.e. 310/12600) and adequacy of staff of 0.0492 or 310/6300.
Conclusion: There is under-utilization of the staff in Umtata General Hospital, South Africa.
Recommendation: To increase utilization of the nurses a process of sharing and merging with a clinic or a ward with similar type of work is recommended.
Keywords: Efficiency, adequacy, utilization, re-allocation, and re-deployment.
African Health Sciences 2003; 3(3): 127 - 130
Objective: To assess adequacy and efficiency of nursing staff in a child welfare clinic.
Method: This was a retrospective study. The workload of two nurses allocated to the child welfare clinic at Umtata General Hospital South Africa was calculated based on the patient numbers and hours of work per week. Calculations excluded time breaks for tea, lunch and annual leave. This work load was compared to the norms of standard examination time that is 12 minutes per patient obtained from the sub directorate of Natalia Office of the Department of Health. Information regarding number of patients attended to by the nurses and their disease conditions was obtained from retrospective review of hospital records.
Results: While each nurse was on duty for 8 hours per day each had only 6 reproductive hours. The two nurses examined only 310 patients giving staff utilization of 2.46% (i.e. 310/12600) and adequacy of staff of 0.0492 or 310/6300.
Conclusion: There is under-utilization of the staff in Umtata General Hospital, South Africa.
Recommendation: To increase utilization of the nurses a process of sharing and merging with a clinic or a ward with similar type of work is recommended.
Keywords: Efficiency, adequacy, utilization, re-allocation, and re-deployment.
African Health Sciences 2003; 3(3): 127 - 130
