Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 11, 2025Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Prevalence of hearing loss among primary school children in Ethiopia
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of hearing loss in children attending primary schools in urban and rural Ethiopia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of hearing loss in children aged 7 to 14 years. A total of 384 children had complete examinations and were included in the study.
Results: The prevalence of hearing loss of all types in the urban school was 6.2% using a cut-off of 40 dB Fletcher index (500–2000 Hz). The prevalence increased to 10.2 % in the same population if a cut-off of 25 dB HL FI was used. In the rural school with a cut-off of 30 dB HL the hearing prevalence was 5.9%. The proportion of conductive hearing loss was lower in the urban school and constituted 16% of all hearing losses. We estimated the proportion of conductive hearing loss in the rural school to be at least 50% . In the urban school the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss was 5.8% while it was much lower at 1.3% and exclusively unilateral in the rural school. The degree of hearing loss according to WHO criteria was calculated only for the urban population. A prevalence of bilateral severe hearing loss (≥61 dB HL) of 0.5% and of moderate hearing loss ( > 41 dB and ≤60dB HL) of 1% was found using WHO criteria.
The prevalence of chronic suppurative otitis media and of dry perforations were similar between schools (2.5 to 2.7%). Otitis media was rare in this study likely due to seasonal influences and exclusion of very young children. These results are compared to similar school studies in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Conclusions: The prevalence of hearing loss in these two Ethiopian cohorts (rural and urban) is in agreement with the data published by WHO for Sub-Saharan Africa. While some of the variation between urban and rural populations may have been real, some of the discrepancy may have resulted from differences in acoustic testing environments. We describe these challenges in hopes of improving universal screening procedures.
Keywords: Hearing loss; primary children; Ethiopia.
