Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 6, 2024DOI:
10.4314/ahs.v24i3.23Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Diagnostic value of FNA, ultrasound elastography and CEUS in thyroid carcinoma
Abstract
Background: To investigate the role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA), sonoelastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.
Methodology: A total of 150 patients with suspected thyroid cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected and divided into group A, group B and group C according to random number table, with 50 cases in each group. FNA was used in group A, ultrasound elastography was used in group B, and CEUS was used in group C. Pathological diagnosis was performed in all patients, and the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared among the three groups.
Results: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA in group A were 90.91%, 70.59% and 84.00%, respectively; the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound elastography in group B were 94.12%, 81.25% and 90.00%, respectively; the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS in group C were 88.57%, 73.33% and 84.00%, respectively; the three groups were compared (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: All three diagnostic techniques had a relatively high sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. Ultrasound elastography had the highest sensitivity and specificity among the three techniques, while FNA and CEUS had similar diagnostic performance.
Keywords: Fine needle aspiration cytology; ultrasound elastography; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; thyroid cancer; diagnostic efficacy.
