Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 6, 2024DOI:
10.4314/ahs.v24i3.4Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
Diversity and antibiotic sensitivity of uropathogens from a regional hospital in Rwanda
Abstract
Background: Urinary tract infections are a common cause for antibiotic consumption. Empirical treatment is common for community-acquired infections owing to predictability of pathogens.
Objectives: Describe sensitivity profiles of uropathogens at a regional hospital in Rwanda.
Methods: Hospital-based cross-sectional study in which clean-catch urine samples were analyzed. A two-stage process involving dipstick urinalysis and urine culture was used to identify true infections. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used for antibiotic sensitivity analysis as per EUCAST guidelines.
Results: Of 198 samples studied, 107 met criterion for UTI with 94 yielding significant growth. Klebsiella pneumoniae (35%), and Escherichia coli (32%) were the most common organisms isolated. Others included Staphylococcal species, Proteus spp, Enterobacter spp and Salmonella. Very high resistance frequencies (above 70%) were observed against amoxycillin, cotrimoxazole, trimethoprim, aztreonam and fosfomycin. Resistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and cephalosporins varied between 40-60%. High levels of cross resistance were observed for drugs of the same class. Resistance to the potentiated penicillins, meropenem, cefoxitin and nitrofurantoin were less than 30%. Piperacillintazo bactum performed best with 91% sensitivity against all organisms tested.
Conclusion: High levels of resistance were observed for most antibiotics studied. For empirical treatment of community-acquired UTI in our setting, nitrofurantoin remains effective while ciprofloxacin is not.
Keywords: Diversity and antibiotic sensitivity; uropathogens; Rwanda.
