Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 15, 2018DOI:
10.4314/ahs.v18i3.27Keywords:
Article Details
While African Health Sciences has been freely accessible online there have been questions on whether it is Open Access or not. We wish to clearly state that indeed African Health Sciences is Open Access. There are key issues regarding Open Access needing clarification for avoidance of doubt:
- 1. Henceforth, papers in African Health Sciences will be published under the CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution License) 4.0 International. See details on https://creativecomons.org/)
- 2. The copyright owners or the authors grant the 3rd party (perpetually and in advance) the right to disseminate, reproduce, or use the research papers in part or in full, format/medium as long as:
- No substantive errors are introduced in the process
- Attribution of authorship and correct citation details are given
- The referencing details are not changed.
Should the papers be reproduced in part, this must be clearly stated.
- 3. The papers will be freely and universally accessible online in an easily readable format such as XML in at least one widely recognized open access repository such as PUBMED CENTRAL.
B. ABRIDGED LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUTHORS AND African Health Sciences
I submitted my manuscript to African Health Sciences and would like to affirm that:
1.0 I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
2.0 I guarantee, on behalf of self and co-authors:
- That the paper is original, and has not been published in any other peer-reviewed journal; nor is it under consideration by other journal (s). It does not infringe existing copyright or any other person’s rights
- That we are/I am the sole author(s) of the paper and with authority to enter into this agreement. My granting rights to African Health Sciences is not in breach of any other obligation
- That the paper contains nothing unlawful, or libelous. Nor anything that would constitute a breach of contract, confidence or commitment given to secrecy, if published
- That I/we have taken care to ensure the integrity of the article.
3.0 I and all co-authors, agree that the paper, if accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (see https://creativecommons.org/)
Main Article Content
A meta-analysis of phosphate binders lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of phosphate binders lanthanum carbonate (LC) versus sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Methods: Studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing phosphate binders lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride, in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis, were identified using a pre-defined search strategy. Phosphate, calcium, calcium-phosphorus product, intact parathyroid hormone, alkaline phosphatase, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were extracted and compared by RevMan 5.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).
Results: Six studies were identified. Meta-analysis showed that SH treatment reduced levels of phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, and total serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) when compared with LC treatment. Furthermore, patients on SH treatment tended to have reduced calcium levels, calcium-phosphorus product, total cholesterol, and triglyceride when compared to patients treated with LC, but there was no statistical difference.
Conclusion: SH treatment of patients with ESRD is more effective compared to LC treatment. However, more well-designed random control trails are required for confirmation.
Keywords: End-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, phosphate binders, lanthanum carbonate (LC), sevelamer hydrochloride (SH), meta-analysis.
